WASHINGTON – RNC Communications Director
Danny Diaz released the following statement today:
“Barack Obama’s pledge to stop Executive agencies from implementing laws
passed by Congress raises serious doubts about his understanding of what the job
of the President of the United States actually is. His refusal to enforce the
law reveals that Barack Obama doesn’t have the experience necessary to do the
job of President, or that he fundamentally lacks the judgment to carry out the
most basic functions of the Executive Branch. What other laws would Barack Obama
direct federal agents not to enforce?”
OBAMA ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA LAWS
Obama Pledged To Stop DEA Raids On Oregon Medical
Marijuana:
Obama Pledged To Stop The Drug Enforcement Administration’s Raids On
Oregon Medical Marijuana Growers. Willamette Week: “Would you
stop the Drug Enforcement Administration’s raids on Oregon medical marijuana
grows?” Obama: “I would because I think our federal agents have better things to
do, like catching criminals and preventing terrorism. The way I want to approach
the issue of medical marijuana is to base it on science. And if there is sound
science that supports the use of medical marijuana and if it is controlled and
prescribed in a way that other medicine is prescribed, then it’s something we
should consider.” (James Pitkin, “Six Minutes With Barack,”
Willamette Week, 5/14/08)
But The Presidential Oath Of Office Requires The President To
“Preserve, Protect And Defend The Constitution Of The United
States”:
The Presidential Oath Of Office, As Specified In Article II, Section
I Of The U.S. Constitution: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I
will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States, and
will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of
the United States.” (U.S. Department Of State Website, usinfo.state.gov,
Accessed 5/14/08)
And The Supreme Court Has Upheld Regulations On Medical
Marijuana:
The Supreme Court Ruled In 2001 And 2005, Affirming The Authority Of
Congress To Regulate The Use Of Marijuana. “In 2001, the Supreme Court
affirmed Congress’s 1970 judgment about marijuana in United States v. Oakland
Cannabis Buyers’ Cooperative et al., 532 U.S. 438 (2001), which held that, given
the absence of medical usefulness, medical necessity is not a defense to
marijuana prosecution. Furthermore, in Gonzales v. Raich, 125 S.Ct. 2195 (2005),
the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the authority of Congress to regulate the use
of potentially harmful substances through the federal Controlled Substances Act
includes the authority to regulate marijuana of a purely intrastate character,
regardless of a state law purporting to authorize ‘medical’ use of marijuana.”
(U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration Website, www.usdoj.gov,
Accessed 5/14/08)