<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Las Vegas TSG Business News &#187; Our Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/category/our-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho</link>
	<description>On Business Life and Politics in Vegas - From the Publisher of SinCity-247</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:10:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>A Fine for Not Using a Biofuel That Doesn’t Exist</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2012/01/a-fine-for-not-using-a-biofuel-that-doesnt-exist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2012/01/a-fine-for-not-using-a-biofuel-that-doesnt-exist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=16631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2012/01/a-fine-for-not-using-a-biofuel-that-doesnt-exist/">A Fine for Not Using a Biofuel That Doesn’t Exist</a></p><p>By MATTHEW L. WALD for the New York Times Published: January 9, 2012 WASHINGTON — When the companies that supply motor fuel close the books on 2011, they will pay about $6.8 million in penalties to the Treasury because they failed to mix a special type of biofuel into their gasoline and diesel as required <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2012/01/a-fine-for-not-using-a-biofuel-that-doesnt-exist/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2012/01/a-fine-for-not-using-a-biofuel-that-doesnt-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPRI&#8217;s litigation center takes aim at long-running constitutional violation</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/12/npris-litigation-center-takes-aim-at-long-running-constitutional-violation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/12/npris-litigation-center-takes-aim-at-long-running-constitutional-violation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nevada GNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Balance Point]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=16231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/12/npris-litigation-center-takes-aim-at-long-running-constitutional-violation/">NPRI&#8217;s litigation center takes aim at long-running constitutional violation</a></p><p>Suit seeks to restore the separation-of-powers principle in Nevada By Andy Matthews It is possible to have legitimate disagreements over the interpretation of parts of Nevada&#8217;s constitution. Article 3, Section 1 — the separation-of-powers clause in Nevada&#8217;s constitution — is not one of them. It reads: The powers of the Government of the State of <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/12/npris-litigation-center-takes-aim-at-long-running-constitutional-violation/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/12/npris-litigation-center-takes-aim-at-long-running-constitutional-violation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online piracy debate far from over</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/11/online-piracy-debate-far-from-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/11/online-piracy-debate-far-from-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 01:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal GNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=15758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/11/online-piracy-debate-far-from-over/">Online piracy debate far from over</a></p><p>By Gautham Nagesh     &#8211; 11/16/11 06:52 PM ET The Hill THE LEDE: Any hope supporters had of the House quickly passing the Stop Online Piracy Act might have been quashed on Wednesday, when a one-sided hearing in front of the House Judiciary Committee sparked a massive backlash online. The legislation would empower the government <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/11/online-piracy-debate-far-from-over/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/11/online-piracy-debate-far-from-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A repellant for tyrants: Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/a-repellant-for-tyrants-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/a-repellant-for-tyrants-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nevada GNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPRI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=15286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/a-repellant-for-tyrants-part-ii/">A repellant for tyrants: Part II</a></p><p>Flouting the separation-of-powers principle breeds autocracy and bureaucratic metastasis By Joseph Becker Nevada Policy Research Institute When state governments ignore the separation-of-powers doctrine, the consequences can be dire. By way of quick review: The separation-of-powers principle provides that those entrusted with duties and powers in either the judicial, executive or legislative branch of a government <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/a-repellant-for-tyrants-part-ii/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/a-repellant-for-tyrants-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>H. R. 358 the Protect Life Act</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/h-r-358-the-protect-life-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/h-r-358-the-protect-life-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal GNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wing Nuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=14987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/h-r-358-the-protect-life-act/">H. R. 358 the Protect Life Act</a></p><p>It never ceases to amaze me just how politicians can bend, warp and distort the truth when it fits their needs!  Ever since the Protect Life Act bill was introduced &#8211; it became the rallying point for abortion advocates and opponents alike! Abortion advocates tout that this is really the &#8220;Let Women Die&#8221; act &#8211; <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/h-r-358-the-protect-life-act/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/h-r-358-the-protect-life-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New California HPV Vaccine Law Frightens Bestselling Author Teresa Tomeo</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/new-california-law-frightens-bestselling-author-teresa-tomeo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/new-california-law-frightens-bestselling-author-teresa-tomeo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=14861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/new-california-law-frightens-bestselling-author-teresa-tomeo/">New California HPV Vaccine Law Frightens Bestselling Author Teresa Tomeo</a></p><p>Measure enables girls 12 and older to get HPV vaccine &#8212; sans parental consent SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 11, 2011 /Christian Newswire/ &#8212; With little fanfare, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Sunday that enables girls 12 and older to get the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine without parental consent. Bestselling author Teresa Tomeo finds it <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/new-california-law-frightens-bestselling-author-teresa-tomeo/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/new-california-law-frightens-bestselling-author-teresa-tomeo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clark County School District police routinely use police powers outside of school grounds</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/clark-county-school-district-police-routinely-use-police-powers-outside-of-school-grounds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/clark-county-school-district-police-routinely-use-police-powers-outside-of-school-grounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[City GNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark County School District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPRI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=14812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/clark-county-school-district-police-routinely-use-police-powers-outside-of-school-grounds/">Clark County School District police routinely use police powers outside of school grounds</a></p><p>Officers &#8216;not concerned about&#8217; state&#8217;s governing statutes By Karen Gray LAS VEGAS — Is the Clark County School District Police Department usurping police powers it is not granted under the law? Nevada Revised Statutes specifically designate school police as Category II peace officers, who have only temporary and restricted authority in Class A felony crimes. <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/clark-county-school-district-police-routinely-use-police-powers-outside-of-school-grounds/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/clark-county-school-district-police-routinely-use-police-powers-outside-of-school-grounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House statement regarding illegal immigration,Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and the state of Arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/white-house-statement-regarding-illegal-immigrationsheriff-joe-arpaio-and-the-state-of-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/white-house-statement-regarding-illegal-immigrationsheriff-joe-arpaio-and-the-state-of-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 02:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=14431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/white-house-statement-regarding-illegal-immigrationsheriff-joe-arpaio-and-the-state-of-arizona/">White House statement regarding illegal immigration,Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and the state of Arizona</a></p><p>Folks &#8211; before we get into the post from Sheriff Joe Arpaio, I would like to say that although I do not agree with everything he says, nor everything he does&#8230;nobody&#8230;not Republican nor Democrat, liberal or conservative, not far left or far right has come up with a more effective solution to the problems effecting <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/white-house-statement-regarding-illegal-immigrationsheriff-joe-arpaio-and-the-state-of-arizona/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/10/white-house-statement-regarding-illegal-immigrationsheriff-joe-arpaio-and-the-state-of-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Under-18 Tan Bans Won’t Work</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/01/why-under-18-tan-bans-won%e2%80%99t-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/01/why-under-18-tan-bans-won%e2%80%99t-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 07:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade & Business Associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Tan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=10954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/01/why-under-18-tan-bans-won%e2%80%99t-work/">Why Under-18 Tan Bans Won’t Work</a></p><p>Groups that plan to propose under-18 tanning restrictions to states, provinces and municipalities are ignoring conflicting data in a blind effort to denegrate any and all UV exposure, International Smart Tan Network believes. Groups are pointing at survey research on tanning are missing important points: Read the rest of this article on the International Smart <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/01/why-under-18-tan-bans-won%e2%80%99t-work/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2011/01/why-under-18-tan-bans-won%e2%80%99t-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just because you have the right to do so, doesn&#8217;t make it right that you do!</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/09/just-because-you-have-the-right-to-do-so-doesnt-make-it-right-that-you-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/09/just-because-you-have-the-right-to-do-so-doesnt-make-it-right-that-you-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Party's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=8057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/09/just-because-you-have-the-right-to-do-so-doesnt-make-it-right-that-you-do/">Just because you have the right to do so, doesn&#8217;t make it right that you do!</a></p><p>Folks &#8211; I said this about the Mosque in New York City just yards from Ground Zero &#8211; and it looks like I&#8217;ve got to say the exact same thing about this Revered in Florida, who will memorialize September 11th, 2001 this year by burning the copies of the Quan. Sir, Just because you have <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/09/just-because-you-have-the-right-to-do-so-doesnt-make-it-right-that-you-do/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/09/just-because-you-have-the-right-to-do-so-doesnt-make-it-right-that-you-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abolish the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?  No &#8211; just clarify it!</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/abolish-the-14th-amendment-to-the-u-s-constitution-no-just-clarify-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/abolish-the-14th-amendment-to-the-u-s-constitution-no-just-clarify-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=7262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/abolish-the-14th-amendment-to-the-u-s-constitution-no-just-clarify-it/">Abolish the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?  No &#8211; just clarify it!</a></p><p>The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution &#8211; is a sore spot for many in this immigration debate.   It is via this section of our Constitution that illegal aliens have been claiming citizenship for their children who are born on U.S. soil &#8211; and therefore eligible for all the benefits afforded any other U.S. Citizen. <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/abolish-the-14th-amendment-to-the-u-s-constitution-no-just-clarify-it/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/abolish-the-14th-amendment-to-the-u-s-constitution-no-just-clarify-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Hole in the Fence of Immigration Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/a-hole-in-the-fence-of-immigration-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/a-hole-in-the-fence-of-immigration-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 03:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=7393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/a-hole-in-the-fence-of-immigration-reform/">A Hole in the Fence of Immigration Reform</a></p><p>A gaping hole sits squarely in the middle of the fence of proposed &#8220;Immigration Reform.&#8221; This crack, while inviting to those on the other side of the border, seems to go largely unnoticed by the politically correct mainstream on the American side. Many experts call this loophole an &#8220;illegal immigration magnet,&#8221; or more commonly, birthright <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/a-hole-in-the-fence-of-immigration-reform/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/08/a-hole-in-the-fence-of-immigration-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN Host Calls for Crackdown on &#8216;Bloggers&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/07/cnn-host-calls-for-crackdown-on-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/07/cnn-host-calls-for-crackdown-on-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=7075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/07/cnn-host-calls-for-crackdown-on-bloggers/">CNN Host Calls for Crackdown on &#8216;Bloggers&#8217;</a></p><p>Should there be a &#8220;gatekeeper&#8221; regulating internet bloggers? In the aftermath of the Shirley Sherrod incident, that&#8217;s what CNN promoted on July 23. Anchors Kyra Phillips and John Roberts discussed the &#8220;mixed blessing of the internet,&#8221; and agreed that there should be a crackdown on anonymous bloggers who disparage others on the internet. Read the <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/07/cnn-host-calls-for-crackdown-on-bloggers/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/07/cnn-host-calls-for-crackdown-on-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact sheet on the Arizona immigration law&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/06/fact-sheet-on-the-arizona-immigration-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/06/fact-sheet-on-the-arizona-immigration-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NumbersUSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=5344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/06/fact-sheet-on-the-arizona-immigration-law/">Fact sheet on the Arizona immigration law&#8230;</a></p><p>Arizona’s Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (Formerly SB 1070, as revised on April 30, 2010) Purpose of the Law: • To ensure “the cooperative enforcement of federal immigration laws throughout all of Arizona;” • To “make attrition through enforcement the public policy of all state and local government agencies in Arizona;” and <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/06/fact-sheet-on-the-arizona-immigration-law/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/06/fact-sheet-on-the-arizona-immigration-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Rep. in accident with suspected illegal immigrant&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/state-rep-in-accident-with-suspected-illegal-immigrant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/state-rep-in-accident-with-suspected-illegal-immigrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=5140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/state-rep-in-accident-with-suspected-illegal-immigrant/">State Rep. in accident with suspected illegal immigrant&#8230;</a></p><p>From myfox Boston&#8230;</p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/state-rep-in-accident-with-suspected-illegal-immigrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The penis is mightier than the gun!</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/the-penis-is-mightier-than-the-gun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/the-penis-is-mightier-than-the-gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 04:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=4995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/the-penis-is-mightier-than-the-gun/">The penis is mightier than the gun!</a></p><p>I think originally that read, the pen is mightier than the sword &#8211; but for some reason in this country, we are more concerned about sex and sexuality &#8211; than almost any kind of violent crime you can think of! We have laws against prostitution, we have laws that state a soft porn magazine cannot <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/the-penis-is-mightier-than-the-gun/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/the-penis-is-mightier-than-the-gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Operation Wetback Fact or Fiction?</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/operation-wetback-fact-or-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/operation-wetback-fact-or-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 21:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican Nationals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=4941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/operation-wetback-fact-or-fiction/">Operation Wetback Fact or Fiction?</a></p><p>There are a lot of emails floating around regarding &#8220;Operation Wetback&#8221;- claiming that 13 million Mexican Nationals were deported in 1954 under President Dwight Eisenhower.  The reason?  So that WWI and Korean Veterans would have a better chance a jobs. Like most internet forwards &#8211; this does have a few bits of truth to it&#8230; <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/operation-wetback-fact-or-fiction/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/05/operation-wetback-fact-or-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Immigration &#8211; outlaws want to write the laws!</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/illegal-immigration-outlaws-want-to-write-the-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/illegal-immigration-outlaws-want-to-write-the-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=4487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/illegal-immigration-outlaws-want-to-write-the-laws/">Illegal Immigration &#8211; outlaws want to write the laws!</a></p><p>In my post yesterday I stated that it is the illegal immagrant community that is the ONLY criminal culture in the United Staters that can get away with protesting the very laws that they themselves are accused of breaking.  Well, Guess what?  It looks like it&#8217;s happening again! According to Reuters&#8230; Protest organizers said on <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/illegal-immigration-outlaws-want-to-write-the-laws/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/illegal-immigration-outlaws-want-to-write-the-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>70% of Arizona Voters Favor New State Measure Cracking Down On Illegal Immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/70-of-arizona-voters-favor-new-state-measure-cracking-down-on-illegal-immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/70-of-arizona-voters-favor-new-state-measure-cracking-down-on-illegal-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=4433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/70-of-arizona-voters-favor-new-state-measure-cracking-down-on-illegal-immigration/">70% of Arizona Voters Favor New State Measure Cracking Down On Illegal Immigration</a></p><p>The Arizona legislature has now passed the toughest measure against illegal immigration in the country, authorizing local police to stop and check the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally. A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that 70% of likely voters in Arizona approve of the legislation, while just <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/70-of-arizona-voters-favor-new-state-measure-cracking-down-on-illegal-immigration/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/70-of-arizona-voters-favor-new-state-measure-cracking-down-on-illegal-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: FCC has no power to regulate Net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/court-fcc-has-no-power-to-regulate-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/court-fcc-has-no-power-to-regulate-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=3922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/court-fcc-has-no-power-to-regulate-net-neutrality/">Court: FCC has no power to regulate Net neutrality</a></p><p>The Federal Communications Commission does not have the legal authority to slap Net neutrality regulations on Internet providers, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday. A three-judge panel in Washington, D.C. unanimously tossed out the FCC&#8217;s August 2008 cease and desist order against Comcast, which had taken measures to slow BitTorrent transfers before voluntarily ending them <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/court-fcc-has-no-power-to-regulate-net-neutrality/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/court-fcc-has-no-power-to-regulate-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas More Law Center Asks Court to Stop Enforcement of the Individual Mandate of Health Care</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/thomas-more-law-center-asks-court-to-stop-enforcement-of-the-individual-mandate-of-health-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/thomas-more-law-center-asks-court-to-stop-enforcement-of-the-individual-mandate-of-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Political Pundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas More Law Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=3919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/thomas-more-law-center-asks-court-to-stop-enforcement-of-the-individual-mandate-of-health-care/">Thomas More Law Center Asks Court to Stop Enforcement of the Individual Mandate of Health Care</a></p><p>ANN ARBOR, MI – In an effort to expedite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision of the newly enacted health care reform act, today, the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, filed a motion in Federal District Court <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/thomas-more-law-center-asks-court-to-stop-enforcement-of-the-individual-mandate-of-health-care/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/thomas-more-law-center-asks-court-to-stop-enforcement-of-the-individual-mandate-of-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is your political preference legally protected under civil-rights law?</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/is-your-political-preference-legally-protected-under-civil-rights-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/is-your-political-preference-legally-protected-under-civil-rights-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=3851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/is-your-political-preference-legally-protected-under-civil-rights-law/">Is your political preference legally protected under civil-rights law?</a></p><p>From the Orlando Sentinel: A doctor who considers the national health-care overhaul to be bad medicine for the country posted a sign on his office door telling patients who voted for President Barack Obama to seek care &#8220;elsewhere.&#8221; &#8220;I&#8217;m not turning anybody away — that would be unethical,&#8221; Dr. Jack Cassell, 56, a Mount Dora <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/is-your-political-preference-legally-protected-under-civil-rights-law/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/04/is-your-political-preference-legally-protected-under-civil-rights-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Census Is Getting Personal</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/03/the-census-is-getting-personal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/03/the-census-is-getting-personal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=3317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/03/the-census-is-getting-personal/">The Census Is Getting Personal</a></p><p>From Jerry Day and the Matrix News Network Part 1 THESE videos is not expert legal advice or a paid professional service. It is layman&#8217;s opinion. Census Video Part 2, Clarifications This video answers the most common questions and objections to the original video &#8220;The Census Is Getting Personal&#8221;. Addressed in this video are the <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/03/the-census-is-getting-personal/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/03/the-census-is-getting-personal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Reconciliation?</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/what-is-reconciliation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/what-is-reconciliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=2664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/what-is-reconciliation/">What is Reconciliation?</a></p><p>How is it that what was once called the &#8220;Constitution Option&#8221; is now considered nuclear? We&#8217;re starting to hear a lot about this parliamentary procedure called &#8220;reconciliation&#8221; &#8211; and very few folks if any really know what it means.  Personally, I remember hearing the threats from the Republicans during the Democrats refusing to give judicial <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/what-is-reconciliation/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/what-is-reconciliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Court Challenge to Federal “Hate Crimes” Act</title>
		<link>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/first-court-challenge-to-federal-%e2%80%9chate-crimes%e2%80%9d-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/first-court-challenge-to-federal-%e2%80%9chate-crimes%e2%80%9d-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kensei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Family Association of Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas More Law Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=2280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/first-court-challenge-to-federal-%e2%80%9chate-crimes%e2%80%9d-act/">First Court Challenge to Federal “Hate Crimes” Act</a></p><p>The Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor Michigan, this morning filed a federal lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr., challenging the constitutionality of the recently-enacted federal Hate Crimes Act.  The Act criminalizes so-called “bias” crimes motivated by a person’s “actual or perceived” “sexual <a href='http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/first-court-challenge-to-federal-%e2%80%9chate-crimes%e2%80%9d-act/'>[...]</a></p></p><p><a href="http://www.lvtsg.com/imho">Las Vegas TSG Business News</a> </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/2010/02/first-court-challenge-to-federal-%e2%80%9chate-crimes%e2%80%9d-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

