Free Speech Rights
I am starting to compile a listing of cases – both for and against our constitutionally protected right to free speech. The reason I do this is to help in my own understand of the lefts expanded concept of speech to reach into realms I do not believe it was meant to go. The concept of anonymous free speech is one that I believe does not deserve to be protected as it infringes upon the rights of those which will be harmed by forms of expression already banned or limited by the supreme court.
In 2009, I wrote two entries regarding the topic of the so called protection of Anonymous Free Speech, and now that we are in the throws of the find days of the mid-term elections, the so called protection of this kind of speech is rearing it’s ugly head. Basically, my argument is that it is NOT the words which are protected by the first amendment – but the person speaking or writing those words. IF – as the ACLU and EFF would have you believe that anonymous postings are protecting under the 1st amendment, then they are implying that it is the words which are protected and not the speaker or writer.
You can read my two posts from 2009 by clicking on the links below. Any way – I will attempt to continue to look into this matter and post what I find here…
- Anonymously Speaking is Free Speech? Posted by Kensei: http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=1720
- Free Speech? Posted by Kensei: http://www.lvtsg.com/imho/?p=457
- INTERNET LAW – The Right to Speak Anonymously on the Internet is not Absolute http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?id=1840&s=latestnews
The US Supreme Court banned or limited the following forms of expression:
- Libelous Speech [New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)]
- Fighting Words [Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942)]
- Commercial Speech [Pharmacy BD. v. Va. Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976)]
- Obscene Speech [Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)]
LexixNexis Results on anonymous free speech query
<ul>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Queers Anonymous : Lesbians, Gay Men, Free Speech , and Cyberspace (38 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Death of Publius: Toward a World Without Anonymous Speech (17 J. L. & Politics 589)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CORPORATE CYBERSMEAR: EMPLOYERS FILE JOHN DOE DEFAMATION LAWSUITS SEEKING THE IDENTITY OF ANONYMOUS EMPLOYEE INTERNET POSTERS (8 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 195)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Applying McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission to Anonymous Speech on the Internet and the Discovery of John Doe’s Identity (58 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1537)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – First Amendment – A State Statute Banning Anonymous Political Leaflets Violates First Amendment Protection of Political Speech – McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 115 S. Ct. 1511 (1995). (26 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1277)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Recording Industry Missteps: Suing Anonymous Filesharers as a Last Resort (26 Pace L. Rev. 273)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Employment Termination for Employee Blogging: Number One Tech Trend for 2005 and Beyond, or a Recipe for Getting Dooced ? (2006 UCLA J. L. Tech. 4)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE REHNQUIST COURT: PRAGMATISM VS. IDEOLOGY IN FREE SPEECH CASES (99 Nw. U.L. Rev. 33)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>AUTHORSHIP, AUDIENCES, AND ANONYMOUS SPEECH (82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1537)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>DON’T SHOOT THE MESSENGER: LIMITING THE LIABILITY OF ANONYMOUS REMAILER OPERATORS (32 N.M.L. Rev. 99)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREE SPEECH AND ECONOMIC POWER: A SYMPOSIUM: TOWARD A DEMOCRACY-CENTERED READING OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT (93 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1055)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CHAPTER: B. HATE CRIMES AND HATE SPEECH (7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 679)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CYBER CIVIL RIGHTS (89 B.U.L. Rev. 61)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Military, Freedom of Speech , and the Internet: Preserving Operational Security and Servicemembers’ Right of Free Speech (87 Tex. L. Rev. 463)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>APPLICATION OF U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCTRINE TO ANONYMITY IN THE NETWORLD (44 Clev. St. L. Rev. 521)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>TOOL OF THE TRADEMARK: BRAND CRITICISM AND FREE SPEECH PROBLEMS WITH THE TRADEMARK DILUTION REVISION ACT OF 2006 (28 Cardozo L. Rev. 1923)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Think Before You Click: Online Anonymity Does Not Make Defamation Legal (20 Hofstra Lab. L.J. 383)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>John Doe Subpoenas: Toward a Consistent Legal Standard (118 Yale L.J. 320)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>National Security Checks Are in the Mail: A First Amendment Analysis of Intelligent Mail and Sender Identification (12 CommLaw Conspectus 265)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Privacy vs. Piracy (9 Int’l J. Comm. L. & Pol’y 7)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE VIRTUES OF KNOWING LESS: JUSTIFYING PRIVACY PROTECTIONS AGAINST DISCLOSURE (53 Duke L.J. 967)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>MRS. MCINTYRE S CHECKBOOK: PRIVACY COSTS OF POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE (6 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Anonymity and the Demands of Civil Procedure in Music Downloading Lawsuits (82 Tul. L. Rev. 1049)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>RIGHTS AGAINST RULES: THE MORAL STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (97 Mich. L. Rev. 1)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>TILTING AT WINDMILLS: DEFAMATION AND THE PRIVATE PERSON IN CYBERSPACE (13 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 547)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>POST-NAPSTER: PEER-TO-PEER FILE SHARING SYSTEMS: CURRENT AND FUTURE ISSUES ON SECONDARY LIABILITY UNDER COPYRIGHT LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN (22 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 37)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE BIRTH OF THE AUTHORNYM: AUTHORSHIP, PSEUDONYMITY, AND TRADEMARK LAW (80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1377)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>ANNUAL SURVEY OF ARKANSAS CASELAW: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (18 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 681)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Constitutional Law — Free Speech — Second Circuit Upholds New York’s Anti-Mask Statute Against Challenge by Klan-Related Group. — Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Kerik, 356 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2004). (117 Harv. L. Rev. 2777)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREEDOM OF SPEECH , SHIELDING CHILDREN, AND TRANSCENDING BALANCING (1997 Sup. Ct. Rev. 141)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Of Mediums and Metaphors: How a Layered Methodology Might Contribute to Constitutional Analysis of Internet Content Regulation (30 Man. L.J. 197)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Clio and the Court: A Reassessment of the Supreme Court’s Uses of History (13 J. L. & Politics 809)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>WHO’S EXPOSING JOHN DOE? DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FIGURE PLAINTIFFS IN SUBPOENAS TO ISPS IN ANONYMOUS ONLINE DEFAMATION SUITS (13 J. Tech. L. & Pol’y 229)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CRIMINAL LAW: ANGLO-AMERICAN PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE (96 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1059)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>A Political Reformer’s Guide to McIntyre and Source Disclosure Laws for Political Advertising (8 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev 133)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>PROTECTING THE CELLULAR CITIZEN-CRITIC: THE STATE OF POLITICAL SPEECH FROM SULLIVAN TO POPA (9 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 353)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Devising a Constitutional National Security Letter Process in Light of Doe v. Ashcroft (94 Geo. L.J. 247)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>OUT OF THIN AIR: USING FIRST AMENDMENT PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS TO REDEEM AMERICAN BROADCASTING REGULATION (39 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 149)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, DEMOCRATIC NORMS, AND INTERNET GOVERNANCE (52 Emory L.J. 187)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>State Regulation of Anonymous Internet Use After ACLU of Georgia v. Miller (30 Ariz. St. L.J. 513)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>ANONYMITY ON THE INTERNET: HOW DOES IT WORK, WHO NEEDS IT, AND WHAT ARE ITS POLICY IMPLICATIONS? (24 Cardozo Arts & Ent LJ 1395)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Speak No Evil: Circumventing Chinese Censorship (45 San Diego L. Rev. 211)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Inherently Dangerous: The Potential for an Internet-Specific Standard Restricting Speech That Performs a Teaching Function (39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 353)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-First Amendment Rights of Direct Democracy Participants Versus the State’s Interest in Regulating the Election Process. Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 636 (1999). (22 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 105)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>”What’s in a Name?” 1 : Civil Unions and the Constitutional Significance of “Marriage” (10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 607)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Proselytizers, Pamphleteers, Pests, and Other First Amendment Champions: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton (18 BYU J. Pub. L. 229)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>IDENTITY, ANONYMITY, AND PRIVACY NUMERO SPECIAL: IDENTITE, ANONYMAT ET PROTECTION DE LA VIE PRIVEE: Naming Names: The Pseudonym in the Name of the Law (3 UOLTJ 53)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Invoking Law as a Basis for Identity in Cyberspace (1998 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Anonymous Campaign Literature and the First Amendment (21 N.C. Cent. L.J. 144)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Role of News Leaks in Governance and the Law of Journalists’ Confidentiality, 1795-2005 (43 San Diego L. Rev. 425)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Anonymous Internet Communication and the First Amendment: A Crack in the Dam of National Sovereignty (3 Va. J.L. & Tech. 1)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Persuasion, Transparency, and Government Speech (56 Hastings L.J. 983)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>STRANGE BREW: METHOD AND FORM IN ELECTORAL SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE (14 S. Cal. Interdis. L.J. 271)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: THE WORLD-WIDE JURISDICTION: AN ANALYSIS OF OVER-INCLUSIVE INTERNET JURISDICTIONAL LAW AND AN ATTEMPT BY CONGRESS TO FIX IT (11 DePaul-LCA J. Art & Ent. L. 267)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Stealing the Covers: The Supreme Court’s Ban on Blanket Primary Elections and Its Effect on a Citizen’s First Amendment Right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (9 CommLaw Conspectus 71)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>A FIRST AMENDMENT COMPASS: NAVIGATING THE SPEECH CLAUSE WITH A FIVE-STEP ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK (29 Sw. U. L. Rev. 401)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Words That Kill? An Economic Model of the Influence of Speech on Behavior (with Particular Reference to Hate Speech ) (34 J. Legal Stud. 93)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>BETWEEN POLITICAL SPEECH AND COLD, HARD CASH: EVALUATING THE FEC’S NEW REGULATIONS FOR 527 GROUPS (100 Nw. U.L. Rev. 925)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Selecting Pennsylvania Judges in the Twenty-First Century (106 Dick. L. Rev. 747)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Building a “New Institutional” Approach to Corporate Speech (59 Ala. L. Rev. 247)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Rethinking Trademark Fair Use (94 Iowa L. Rev. 49)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CLICKING AWAY YOUR SPEECH RIGHTS: THE ENFORCEABILITY OF GAGWRAP LICENSES (12 Comm. L. & Pol’y 37)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Campaign Finance Reform After McCain-Feingold: The More Speech -More Competition Solution (16 J. L. & Politics 571)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>ANNUAL NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE: NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS: 2004 COMPILATION: Freedom of Speech : Supreme Court of New York Appellate Term, First Department: People v. Bull 1 (21 Touro L. Rev. 167)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>PURVEYORS OF HATE ON THE INTERNET: ARE WE READY FOR HATE SPAM? (17 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 379)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>PLANTING THE SEEDS OF HATRED: WHY IMMINENCE SHOULD NO LONGER BE REQUIRED TO IMPOSE LIABILITY ON INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS (29 Cap. U.L. Rev. 835)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>MIXED SPEECH : INEQUITIES THAT RESULT FROM AN AMBIGUOUS DOCTRINE (19 St. John’s J.L. Comm. 159)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Stand by Your First Amendment Values – Not Your Ad: The Court’s Wrong Turn in McConnell v. FEC (23 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 369)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Internet Copyright Infringement and Service Providers: The Case for a Negotiated Rulemaking Alternative (35 San Diego L. Rev. 219)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>LITIGANT SENSITIVITY IN FIRST AMENDMENT LAW (98 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1291)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Blogosphere: Past, Present, and Future. Preserving the Unfettered Development of Alternative Journalism (44 Cal. W. L. Rev. 477)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>INTERNET INDECENCY AND IMPRESSIONABLE MINDS (44 Vill. L. Rev. 745)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Finger in the Dike: Campaign Finance Regulation After McConnell (39 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 629)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Defamed by a Blogger: Legal Protections, Self-Regulation and Other Failures (2006 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol’y 343)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Constitutional Secrecy: Aligning National Security Letter Nondisclosure Provisions with First Amendment Rights (58 Duke L.J. 473)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Anonymous Correspondence Disparaging Law School Faculty (10 Digest 53)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>SYMPOSIUM ON THE REGULATION OF FREE EXPRESSION IN THE PUBLIC FORUM: CITY OF LADUE V. GILLEO: CONTENT DISCRIMINATION AND THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC DEBATE (14 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 349)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Accountable Internet: Peer Production of Internet Governance (9 Va. J.L. & Tech. 9)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Law of Lobbying: Anonymity and Its Dubious Relevance to the Constitutionality of Lobbying Disclosure Legislation (19 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev 69)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SOME THOUGHTS AFTER ELDRED, 44 LIQUORMART, AND BARTNICKI (40 Hous. L. Rev. 697)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Protecting Copyright at the Expense of Internet Anonymity: The Constitutionality of Forced Identity Disclosure under 512(h) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (23 Temp. Envtl. L. & Tech. J. 243)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY: ARTICLE PEER-TO-PEER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: WILL NAPSTER, GNUTELLA, AND FREENET CREATE A COPYRIGHT NIRVANA OR GEHENNA? (27 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1761)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Creating Competitive and Informative Campaigns: A Comprehensive Approach to ” Free Air Time” for Political Candidates (22 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 351)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE FIRST AMENDMENT AS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (82 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 112)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>STATE LEGISLATION MANDATING SCHOOL CYBERBULLYING POLICIES AND THE POTENTIAL THREAT TO STUDENTS’ FREE SPEECH RIGHTS (33 Vt. L. Rev. 283)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>RECONCILING SEXUAL HARASSMENT SANCTIONS AND FREE SPEECH RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE (4 Va. J. Soc. Pol’y & L. 127)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>NO SUCH THING AS ” FREE ” INTERNET: SAFEGUARDING PRIVACY AND FREE SPEECH IN MUNICIPAL WIRELESS SYSTEMS (11 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol’y 519)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>”WHEN A NATION IS AT WAR”: A CONTEXT-DEPENDENT THEORY OF FREE SPEECH FOR THE REGULATION OF WEAPON RECIPES (22 Cardozo Arts & Ent LJ 683)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Injustice in Our Schools: Students’ Free Speech Rights Are Not Being Vigilantly Protected (21 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 265)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Free Speech in the Military Community: Striking a Balance Between Personal Rights and Military Necessity (45 A.F. L. Rev. 303)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREE SPEECH WITHOUT ROMANCE: PUBLIC CHOICE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. (105 Harv. L. Rev. 554)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>TO SAY “I DO”: SHAHAR V. BOWERS, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS (15 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 381)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREE EXERCISE OF SPEECH IN SHOPPING MALLS: BASES THAT SUPPORT AN INDEPENDENT INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 40 OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS (69 Alb. L. Rev. 449)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>From Social Friction to Social Meaning: What Expressive Uses of Code Tell Us About Free Speech (64 Ohio St. L.J. 1515)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Dignity and Conflicts of Constitutional Values: The Case of Free Speech and Equal Protection (43 San Diego L. Rev. 527)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT CROSS BURNING, INTIMIDATION, AND FREE SPEECH (80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1287)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Free Speech in Cyberspace: Communications Decency and Beyond (3 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 4)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Protesting the President: Free Speech Zones and the First Amendment (58 Rutgers L. Rev. 245)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE UNITED MALL OF AMERICA: FREE SPEECH , STATE CONSTITUTIONS, AND THE GROWING FORTRESS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY (33 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 615)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Tough Talk from the Supreme Court on Free Speech : The Illusory Per Se Rule in Garcetti as Further Evidence of Connick’s Unworkable Employee/Citizen Speech Partition (8 J.L. Soc’y 45)</a></li>
</ul>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Queers Anonymous : Lesbians, Gay Men, Free Speech , and Cyberspace (38 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Death of Publius: Toward a World Without Anonymous Speech (17 J. L. & Politics 589)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CORPORATE CYBERSMEAR: EMPLOYERS FILE JOHN DOE DEFAMATION LAWSUITS SEEKING THE IDENTITY OF ANONYMOUS EMPLOYEE INTERNET POSTERS (8 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 195)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Applying McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission to Anonymous Speech on the Internet and the Discovery of John Doe’s Identity (58 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1537)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – First Amendment – A State Statute Banning Anonymous Political Leaflets Violates First Amendment Protection of Political Speech – McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 115 S. Ct. 1511 (1995). (26 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1277)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Recording Industry Missteps: Suing Anonymous Filesharers as a Last Resort (26 Pace L. Rev. 273)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Employment Termination for Employee Blogging: Number One Tech Trend for 2005 and Beyond, or a Recipe for Getting Dooced ? (2006 UCLA J. L. Tech. 4)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE REHNQUIST COURT: PRAGMATISM VS. IDEOLOGY IN FREE SPEECH CASES (99 Nw. U.L. Rev. 33)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>AUTHORSHIP, AUDIENCES, AND ANONYMOUS SPEECH (82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1537)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>DON’T SHOOT THE MESSENGER: LIMITING THE LIABILITY OF ANONYMOUS REMAILER OPERATORS (32 N.M.L. Rev. 99)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREE SPEECH AND ECONOMIC POWER: A SYMPOSIUM: TOWARD A DEMOCRACY-CENTERED READING OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT (93 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1055)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CHAPTER: B. HATE CRIMES AND HATE SPEECH (7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 679)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CYBER CIVIL RIGHTS (89 B.U.L. Rev. 61)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Military, Freedom of Speech , and the Internet: Preserving Operational Security and Servicemembers’ Right of Free Speech (87 Tex. L. Rev. 463)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>APPLICATION OF U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCTRINE TO ANONYMITY IN THE NETWORLD (44 Clev. St. L. Rev. 521)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>TOOL OF THE TRADEMARK: BRAND CRITICISM AND FREE SPEECH PROBLEMS WITH THE TRADEMARK DILUTION REVISION ACT OF 2006 (28 Cardozo L. Rev. 1923)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Think Before You Click: Online Anonymity Does Not Make Defamation Legal (20 Hofstra Lab. L.J. 383)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>John Doe Subpoenas: Toward a Consistent Legal Standard (118 Yale L.J. 320)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>National Security Checks Are in the Mail: A First Amendment Analysis of Intelligent Mail and Sender Identification (12 CommLaw Conspectus 265)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Privacy vs. Piracy (9 Int’l J. Comm. L. & Pol’y 7)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE VIRTUES OF KNOWING LESS: JUSTIFYING PRIVACY PROTECTIONS AGAINST DISCLOSURE (53 Duke L.J. 967)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>MRS. MCINTYRE S CHECKBOOK: PRIVACY COSTS OF POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE (6 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Anonymity and the Demands of Civil Procedure in Music Downloading Lawsuits (82 Tul. L. Rev. 1049)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>RIGHTS AGAINST RULES: THE MORAL STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (97 Mich. L. Rev. 1)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>TILTING AT WINDMILLS: DEFAMATION AND THE PRIVATE PERSON IN CYBERSPACE (13 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 547)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>POST-NAPSTER: PEER-TO-PEER FILE SHARING SYSTEMS: CURRENT AND FUTURE ISSUES ON SECONDARY LIABILITY UNDER COPYRIGHT LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN (22 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 37)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE BIRTH OF THE AUTHORNYM: AUTHORSHIP, PSEUDONYMITY, AND TRADEMARK LAW (80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1377)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>ANNUAL SURVEY OF ARKANSAS CASELAW: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (18 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 681)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Constitutional Law — Free Speech — Second Circuit Upholds New York’s Anti-Mask Statute Against Challenge by Klan-Related Group. — Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Kerik, 356 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2004). (117 Harv. L. Rev. 2777)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREEDOM OF SPEECH , SHIELDING CHILDREN, AND TRANSCENDING BALANCING (1997 Sup. Ct. Rev. 141)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Of Mediums and Metaphors: How a Layered Methodology Might Contribute to Constitutional Analysis of Internet Content Regulation (30 Man. L.J. 197)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Clio and the Court: A Reassessment of the Supreme Court’s Uses of History (13 J. L. & Politics 809)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>WHO’S EXPOSING JOHN DOE? DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FIGURE PLAINTIFFS IN SUBPOENAS TO ISPS IN ANONYMOUS ONLINE DEFAMATION SUITS (13 J. Tech. L. & Pol’y 229)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CRIMINAL LAW: ANGLO-AMERICAN PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE (96 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1059)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>A Political Reformer’s Guide to McIntyre and Source Disclosure Laws for Political Advertising (8 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev 133)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>PROTECTING THE CELLULAR CITIZEN-CRITIC: THE STATE OF POLITICAL SPEECH FROM SULLIVAN TO POPA (9 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 353)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Devising a Constitutional National Security Letter Process in Light of Doe v. Ashcroft (94 Geo. L.J. 247)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>OUT OF THIN AIR: USING FIRST AMENDMENT PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS TO REDEEM AMERICAN BROADCASTING REGULATION (39 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 149)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, DEMOCRATIC NORMS, AND INTERNET GOVERNANCE (52 Emory L.J. 187)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>State Regulation of Anonymous Internet Use After ACLU of Georgia v. Miller (30 Ariz. St. L.J. 513)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>ANONYMITY ON THE INTERNET: HOW DOES IT WORK, WHO NEEDS IT, AND WHAT ARE ITS POLICY IMPLICATIONS? (24 Cardozo Arts & Ent LJ 1395)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Speak No Evil: Circumventing Chinese Censorship (45 San Diego L. Rev. 211)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Inherently Dangerous: The Potential for an Internet-Specific Standard Restricting Speech That Performs a Teaching Function (39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 353)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-First Amendment Rights of Direct Democracy Participants Versus the State’s Interest in Regulating the Election Process. Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 636 (1999). (22 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 105)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>”What’s in a Name?” 1 : Civil Unions and the Constitutional Significance of “Marriage” (10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 607)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Proselytizers, Pamphleteers, Pests, and Other First Amendment Champions: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton (18 BYU J. Pub. L. 229)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>IDENTITY, ANONYMITY, AND PRIVACY NUMERO SPECIAL: IDENTITE, ANONYMAT ET PROTECTION DE LA VIE PRIVEE: Naming Names: The Pseudonym in the Name of the Law (3 UOLTJ 53)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Invoking Law as a Basis for Identity in Cyberspace (1998 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Anonymous Campaign Literature and the First Amendment (21 N.C. Cent. L.J. 144)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Role of News Leaks in Governance and the Law of Journalists’ Confidentiality, 1795-2005 (43 San Diego L. Rev. 425)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Anonymous Internet Communication and the First Amendment: A Crack in the Dam of National Sovereignty (3 Va. J.L. & Tech. 1)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Persuasion, Transparency, and Government Speech (56 Hastings L.J. 983)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>STRANGE BREW: METHOD AND FORM IN ELECTORAL SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE (14 S. Cal. Interdis. L.J. 271)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: THE WORLD-WIDE JURISDICTION: AN ANALYSIS OF OVER-INCLUSIVE INTERNET JURISDICTIONAL LAW AND AN ATTEMPT BY CONGRESS TO FIX IT (11 DePaul-LCA J. Art & Ent. L. 267)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Stealing the Covers: The Supreme Court’s Ban on Blanket Primary Elections and Its Effect on a Citizen’s First Amendment Right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (9 CommLaw Conspectus 71)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>A FIRST AMENDMENT COMPASS: NAVIGATING THE SPEECH CLAUSE WITH A FIVE-STEP ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK (29 Sw. U. L. Rev. 401)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Words That Kill? An Economic Model of the Influence of Speech on Behavior (with Particular Reference to Hate Speech ) (34 J. Legal Stud. 93)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>BETWEEN POLITICAL SPEECH AND COLD, HARD CASH: EVALUATING THE FEC’S NEW REGULATIONS FOR 527 GROUPS (100 Nw. U.L. Rev. 925)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Selecting Pennsylvania Judges in the Twenty-First Century (106 Dick. L. Rev. 747)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Building a “New Institutional” Approach to Corporate Speech (59 Ala. L. Rev. 247)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Rethinking Trademark Fair Use (94 Iowa L. Rev. 49)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>CLICKING AWAY YOUR SPEECH RIGHTS: THE ENFORCEABILITY OF GAGWRAP LICENSES (12 Comm. L. & Pol’y 37)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Campaign Finance Reform After McCain-Feingold: The More Speech -More Competition Solution (16 J. L. & Politics 571)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>ANNUAL NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE: NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS: 2004 COMPILATION: Freedom of Speech : Supreme Court of New York Appellate Term, First Department: People v. Bull 1 (21 Touro L. Rev. 167)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>PURVEYORS OF HATE ON THE INTERNET: ARE WE READY FOR HATE SPAM? (17 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 379)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>PLANTING THE SEEDS OF HATRED: WHY IMMINENCE SHOULD NO LONGER BE REQUIRED TO IMPOSE LIABILITY ON INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS (29 Cap. U.L. Rev. 835)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>MIXED SPEECH : INEQUITIES THAT RESULT FROM AN AMBIGUOUS DOCTRINE (19 St. John’s J.L. Comm. 159)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Stand by Your First Amendment Values – Not Your Ad: The Court’s Wrong Turn in McConnell v. FEC (23 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 369)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Internet Copyright Infringement and Service Providers: The Case for a Negotiated Rulemaking Alternative (35 San Diego L. Rev. 219)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>LITIGANT SENSITIVITY IN FIRST AMENDMENT LAW (98 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1291)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Blogosphere: Past, Present, and Future. Preserving the Unfettered Development of Alternative Journalism (44 Cal. W. L. Rev. 477)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>INTERNET INDECENCY AND IMPRESSIONABLE MINDS (44 Vill. L. Rev. 745)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Finger in the Dike: Campaign Finance Regulation After McConnell (39 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 629)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Defamed by a Blogger: Legal Protections, Self-Regulation and Other Failures (2006 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol’y 343)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Constitutional Secrecy: Aligning National Security Letter Nondisclosure Provisions with First Amendment Rights (58 Duke L.J. 473)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Anonymous Correspondence Disparaging Law School Faculty (10 Digest 53)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>SYMPOSIUM ON THE REGULATION OF FREE EXPRESSION IN THE PUBLIC FORUM: CITY OF LADUE V. GILLEO: CONTENT DISCRIMINATION AND THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC DEBATE (14 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 349)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Accountable Internet: Peer Production of Internet Governance (9 Va. J.L. & Tech. 9)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>The Law of Lobbying: Anonymity and Its Dubious Relevance to the Constitutionality of Lobbying Disclosure Legislation (19 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev 69)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SOME THOUGHTS AFTER ELDRED, 44 LIQUORMART, AND BARTNICKI (40 Hous. L. Rev. 697)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Protecting Copyright at the Expense of Internet Anonymity: The Constitutionality of Forced Identity Disclosure under 512(h) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (23 Temp. Envtl. L. & Tech. J. 243)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY: ARTICLE PEER-TO-PEER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: WILL NAPSTER, GNUTELLA, AND FREENET CREATE A COPYRIGHT NIRVANA OR GEHENNA? (27 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1761)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Creating Competitive and Informative Campaigns: A Comprehensive Approach to ” Free Air Time” for Political Candidates (22 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 351)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE FIRST AMENDMENT AS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (82 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 112)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>STATE LEGISLATION MANDATING SCHOOL CYBERBULLYING POLICIES AND THE POTENTIAL THREAT TO STUDENTS’ FREE SPEECH RIGHTS (33 Vt. L. Rev. 283)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>RECONCILING SEXUAL HARASSMENT SANCTIONS AND FREE SPEECH RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE (4 Va. J. Soc. Pol’y & L. 127)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>NO SUCH THING AS ” FREE ” INTERNET: SAFEGUARDING PRIVACY AND FREE SPEECH IN MUNICIPAL WIRELESS SYSTEMS (11 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol’y 519)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>”WHEN A NATION IS AT WAR”: A CONTEXT-DEPENDENT THEORY OF FREE SPEECH FOR THE REGULATION OF WEAPON RECIPES (22 Cardozo Arts & Ent LJ 683)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Injustice in Our Schools: Students’ Free Speech Rights Are Not Being Vigilantly Protected (21 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 265)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Free Speech in the Military Community: Striking a Balance Between Personal Rights and Military Necessity (45 A.F. L. Rev. 303)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREE SPEECH WITHOUT ROMANCE: PUBLIC CHOICE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. (105 Harv. L. Rev. 554)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>TO SAY “I DO”: SHAHAR V. BOWERS, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS (15 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 381)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>FREE EXERCISE OF SPEECH IN SHOPPING MALLS: BASES THAT SUPPORT AN INDEPENDENT INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 40 OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS (69 Alb. L. Rev. 449)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>From Social Friction to Social Meaning: What Expressive Uses of Code Tell Us About Free Speech (64 Ohio St. L.J. 1515)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Dignity and Conflicts of Constitutional Values: The Case of Free Speech and Equal Protection (43 San Diego L. Rev. 527)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT CROSS BURNING, INTIMIDATION, AND FREE SPEECH (80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1287)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Free Speech in Cyberspace: Communications Decency and Beyond (3 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 4)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Protesting the President: Free Speech Zones and the First Amendment (58 Rutgers L. Rev. 245)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>THE UNITED MALL OF AMERICA: FREE SPEECH , STATE CONSTITUTIONS, AND THE GROWING FORTRESS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY (33 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 615)</a></li>
<li><a rel=”nofollow”>Tough Talk from the Supreme Court on Free Speech : The Illusory Per Se Rule in Garcetti as Further Evidence of Connick’s Unworkable Employee/Citizen Speech Partition (8 J.L. Soc’y 45)</a></li>
</ul>
- Queers Anonymous : Lesbians, Gay Men, Free Speech , and Cyberspace (38 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 159)
- Death of Publius: Toward a World Without Anonymous Speech (17 J. L. & Politics 589)
- CORPORATE CYBERSMEAR: EMPLOYERS FILE JOHN DOE DEFAMATION LAWSUITS SEEKING THE IDENTITY OF ANONYMOUS EMPLOYEE INTERNET POSTERS (8 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 195)
- Applying McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission to Anonymous Speech on the Internet and the Discovery of John Doe’s Identity (58 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1537)
- CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – First Amendment – A State Statute Banning Anonymous Political Leaflets Violates First Amendment Protection of Political Speech – McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 115 S. Ct. 1511 (1995). (26 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1277)
- Recording Industry Missteps: Suing Anonymous Filesharers as a Last Resort (26 Pace L. Rev. 273)
- Employment Termination for Employee Blogging: Number One Tech Trend for 2005 and Beyond, or a Recipe for Getting Dooced ? (2006 UCLA J. L. Tech. 4)
- THE REHNQUIST COURT: PRAGMATISM VS. IDEOLOGY IN FREE SPEECH CASES (99 Nw. U.L. Rev. 33)
- AUTHORSHIP, AUDIENCES, AND ANONYMOUS SPEECH (82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1537)
- DON’T SHOOT THE MESSENGER: LIMITING THE LIABILITY OF ANONYMOUS REMAILER OPERATORS (32 N.M.L. Rev. 99)
- FREE SPEECH AND ECONOMIC POWER: A SYMPOSIUM: TOWARD A DEMOCRACY-CENTERED READING OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT (93 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1055)
- CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CHAPTER: B. HATE CRIMES AND HATE SPEECH (7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 679)
- CYBER CIVIL RIGHTS (89 B.U.L. Rev. 61)
- The Military, Freedom of Speech , and the Internet: Preserving Operational Security and Servicemembers’ Right of Free Speech (87 Tex. L. Rev. 463)
- APPLICATION OF U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCTRINE TO ANONYMITY IN THE NETWORLD (44 Clev. St. L. Rev. 521)
- TOOL OF THE TRADEMARK: BRAND CRITICISM AND FREE SPEECH PROBLEMS WITH THE TRADEMARK DILUTION REVISION ACT OF 2006 (28 Cardozo L. Rev. 1923)
- Think Before You Click: Online Anonymity Does Not Make Defamation Legal (20 Hofstra Lab. L.J. 383)
- John Doe Subpoenas: Toward a Consistent Legal Standard (118 Yale L.J. 320)
- National Security Checks Are in the Mail: A First Amendment Analysis of Intelligent Mail and Sender Identification (12 CommLaw Conspectus 265)
- Privacy vs. Piracy (9 Int’l J. Comm. L. & Pol’y 7)
- THE VIRTUES OF KNOWING LESS: JUSTIFYING PRIVACY PROTECTIONS AGAINST DISCLOSURE (53 Duke L.J. 967)
- MRS. MCINTYRE S CHECKBOOK: PRIVACY COSTS OF POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE (6 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1)
- Anonymity and the Demands of Civil Procedure in Music Downloading Lawsuits (82 Tul. L. Rev. 1049)
- RIGHTS AGAINST RULES: THE MORAL STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (97 Mich. L. Rev. 1)
- TILTING AT WINDMILLS: DEFAMATION AND THE PRIVATE PERSON IN CYBERSPACE (13 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 547)
- POST-NAPSTER: PEER-TO-PEER FILE SHARING SYSTEMS: CURRENT AND FUTURE ISSUES ON SECONDARY LIABILITY UNDER COPYRIGHT LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN (22 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 37)
- THE BIRTH OF THE AUTHORNYM: AUTHORSHIP, PSEUDONYMITY, AND TRADEMARK LAW (80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1377)
- ANNUAL SURVEY OF ARKANSAS CASELAW: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (18 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 681)
- Constitutional Law — Free Speech — Second Circuit Upholds New York’s Anti-Mask Statute Against Challenge by Klan-Related Group. — Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Kerik, 356 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2004). (117 Harv. L. Rev. 2777)
- FREEDOM OF SPEECH , SHIELDING CHILDREN, AND TRANSCENDING BALANCING (1997 Sup. Ct. Rev. 141)
- Of Mediums and Metaphors: How a Layered Methodology Might Contribute to Constitutional Analysis of Internet Content Regulation (30 Man. L.J. 197)
- Clio and the Court: A Reassessment of the Supreme Court’s Uses of History (13 J. L. & Politics 809)
- WHO’S EXPOSING JOHN DOE? DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FIGURE PLAINTIFFS IN SUBPOENAS TO ISPS IN ANONYMOUS ONLINE DEFAMATION SUITS (13 J. Tech. L. & Pol’y 229)
- CRIMINAL LAW: ANGLO-AMERICAN PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE (96 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1059)
- A Political Reformer’s Guide to McIntyre and Source Disclosure Laws for Political Advertising (8 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev 133)
- PROTECTING THE CELLULAR CITIZEN-CRITIC: THE STATE OF POLITICAL SPEECH FROM SULLIVAN TO POPA (9 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 353)
- Devising a Constitutional National Security Letter Process in Light of Doe v. Ashcroft (94 Geo. L.J. 247)
- OUT OF THIN AIR: USING FIRST AMENDMENT PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS TO REDEEM AMERICAN BROADCASTING REGULATION (39 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 149)
- FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, DEMOCRATIC NORMS, AND INTERNET GOVERNANCE (52 Emory L.J. 187)
- State Regulation of Anonymous Internet Use After ACLU of Georgia v. Miller (30 Ariz. St. L.J. 513)
- ANONYMITY ON THE INTERNET: HOW DOES IT WORK, WHO NEEDS IT, AND WHAT ARE ITS POLICY IMPLICATIONS? (24 Cardozo Arts & Ent LJ 1395)
- Speak No Evil: Circumventing Chinese Censorship (45 San Diego L. Rev. 211)
- Inherently Dangerous: The Potential for an Internet-Specific Standard Restricting Speech That Performs a Teaching Function (39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 353)
- CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-First Amendment Rights of Direct Democracy Participants Versus the State’s Interest in Regulating the Election Process. Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 636 (1999). (22 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 105)
- “What’s in a Name?” 1 : Civil Unions and the Constitutional Significance of “Marriage” (10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 607)
- Proselytizers, Pamphleteers, Pests, and Other First Amendment Champions: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton (18 BYU J. Pub. L. 229)
- IDENTITY, ANONYMITY, AND PRIVACY NUMERO SPECIAL: IDENTITE, ANONYMAT ET PROTECTION DE LA VIE PRIVEE: Naming Names: The Pseudonym in the Name of the Law (3 UOLTJ 53)
- Invoking Law as a Basis for Identity in Cyberspace (1998 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1)
- Anonymous Campaign Literature and the First Amendment (21 N.C. Cent. L.J. 144)
- The Role of News Leaks in Governance and the Law of Journalists’ Confidentiality, 1795-2005 (43 San Diego L. Rev. 425)
- Anonymous Internet Communication and the First Amendment: A Crack in the Dam of National Sovereignty (3 Va. J.L. & Tech. 1)
- Persuasion, Transparency, and Government Speech (56 Hastings L.J. 983)
- STRANGE BREW: METHOD AND FORM IN ELECTORAL SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE (14 S. Cal. Interdis. L.J. 271)
- LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: THE WORLD-WIDE JURISDICTION: AN ANALYSIS OF OVER-INCLUSIVE INTERNET JURISDICTIONAL LAW AND AN ATTEMPT BY CONGRESS TO FIX IT (11 DePaul-LCA J. Art & Ent. L. 267)
- Stealing the Covers: The Supreme Court’s Ban on Blanket Primary Elections and Its Effect on a Citizen’s First Amendment Right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (9 CommLaw Conspectus 71)
- A FIRST AMENDMENT COMPASS: NAVIGATING THE SPEECH CLAUSE WITH A FIVE-STEP ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK (29 Sw. U. L. Rev. 401)
- Words That Kill? An Economic Model of the Influence of Speech on Behavior (with Particular Reference to Hate Speech ) (34 J. Legal Stud. 93)
- BETWEEN POLITICAL SPEECH AND COLD, HARD CASH: EVALUATING THE FEC’S NEW REGULATIONS FOR 527 GROUPS (100 Nw. U.L. Rev. 925)
- Selecting Pennsylvania Judges in the Twenty-First Century (106 Dick. L. Rev. 747)
- Building a “New Institutional” Approach to Corporate Speech (59 Ala. L. Rev. 247)
- Rethinking Trademark Fair Use (94 Iowa L. Rev. 49)
- CLICKING AWAY YOUR SPEECH RIGHTS: THE ENFORCEABILITY OF GAGWRAP LICENSES (12 Comm. L. & Pol’y 37)
- Campaign Finance Reform After McCain-Feingold: The More Speech -More Competition Solution (16 J. L. & Politics 571)
- ANNUAL NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE: NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS: 2004 COMPILATION: Freedom of Speech : Supreme Court of New York Appellate Term, First Department: People v. Bull 1 (21 Touro L. Rev. 167)
- PURVEYORS OF HATE ON THE INTERNET: ARE WE READY FOR HATE SPAM? (17 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 379)
- PLANTING THE SEEDS OF HATRED: WHY IMMINENCE SHOULD NO LONGER BE REQUIRED TO IMPOSE LIABILITY ON INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS (29 Cap. U.L. Rev. 835)
- MIXED SPEECH : INEQUITIES THAT RESULT FROM AN AMBIGUOUS DOCTRINE (19 St. John’s J.L. Comm. 159)
- Stand by Your First Amendment Values – Not Your Ad: The Court’s Wrong Turn in McConnell v. FEC (23 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 369)
- Internet Copyright Infringement and Service Providers: The Case for a Negotiated Rulemaking Alternative (35 San Diego L. Rev. 219)
- LITIGANT SENSITIVITY IN FIRST AMENDMENT LAW (98 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1291)
- The Blogosphere: Past, Present, and Future. Preserving the Unfettered Development of Alternative Journalism (44 Cal. W. L. Rev. 477)
- INTERNET INDECENCY AND IMPRESSIONABLE MINDS (44 Vill. L. Rev. 745)
- The Finger in the Dike: Campaign Finance Regulation After McConnell (39 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 629)
- Defamed by a Blogger: Legal Protections, Self-Regulation and Other Failures (2006 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol’y 343)
- Constitutional Secrecy: Aligning National Security Letter Nondisclosure Provisions with First Amendment Rights (58 Duke L.J. 473)
- Anonymous Correspondence Disparaging Law School Faculty (10 Digest 53)
- SYMPOSIUM ON THE REGULATION OF FREE EXPRESSION IN THE PUBLIC FORUM: CITY OF LADUE V. GILLEO: CONTENT DISCRIMINATION AND THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC DEBATE (14 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 349)
- The Accountable Internet: Peer Production of Internet Governance (9 Va. J.L. & Tech. 9)
- The Law of Lobbying: Anonymity and Its Dubious Relevance to the Constitutionality of Lobbying Disclosure Legislation (19 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev 69)
- FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SOME THOUGHTS AFTER ELDRED, 44 LIQUORMART, AND BARTNICKI (40 Hous. L. Rev. 697)
- Protecting Copyright at the Expense of Internet Anonymity: The Constitutionality of Forced Identity Disclosure under 512(h) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (23 Temp. Envtl. L. & Tech. J. 243)
- ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY: ARTICLE PEER-TO-PEER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: WILL NAPSTER, GNUTELLA, AND FREENET CREATE A COPYRIGHT NIRVANA OR GEHENNA? (27 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1761)
- Creating Competitive and Informative Campaigns: A Comprehensive Approach to ” Free Air Time” for Political Candidates (22 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 351)
- THE FIRST AMENDMENT AS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (82 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 112)
- STATE LEGISLATION MANDATING SCHOOL CYBERBULLYING POLICIES AND THE POTENTIAL THREAT TO STUDENTS’ FREE SPEECH RIGHTS (33 Vt. L. Rev. 283)
- RECONCILING SEXUAL HARASSMENT SANCTIONS AND FREE SPEECH RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE (4 Va. J. Soc. Pol’y & L. 127)
- NO SUCH THING AS ” FREE ” INTERNET: SAFEGUARDING PRIVACY AND FREE SPEECH IN MUNICIPAL WIRELESS SYSTEMS (11 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol’y 519)
- “WHEN A NATION IS AT WAR”: A CONTEXT-DEPENDENT THEORY OF FREE SPEECH FOR THE REGULATION OF WEAPON RECIPES (22 Cardozo Arts & Ent LJ 683)
- Injustice in Our Schools: Students’ Free Speech Rights Are Not Being Vigilantly Protected (21 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 265)
- Free Speech in the Military Community: Striking a Balance Between Personal Rights and Military Necessity (45 A.F. L. Rev. 303)
- FREE SPEECH WITHOUT ROMANCE: PUBLIC CHOICE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. (105 Harv. L. Rev. 554)
- TO SAY “I DO”: SHAHAR V. BOWERS, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS (15 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 381)
- FREE EXERCISE OF SPEECH IN SHOPPING MALLS: BASES THAT SUPPORT AN INDEPENDENT INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 40 OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS (69 Alb. L. Rev. 449)
- From Social Friction to Social Meaning: What Expressive Uses of Code Tell Us About Free Speech (64 Ohio St. L.J. 1515)
- Dignity and Conflicts of Constitutional Values: The Case of Free Speech and Equal Protection (43 San Diego L. Rev. 527)
- A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT CROSS BURNING, INTIMIDATION, AND FREE SPEECH (80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1287)
- Free Speech in Cyberspace: Communications Decency and Beyond (3 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 4)
- Protesting the President: Free Speech Zones and the First Amendment (58 Rutgers L. Rev. 245)
- THE UNITED MALL OF AMERICA: FREE SPEECH , STATE CONSTITUTIONS, AND THE GROWING FORTRESS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY (33 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 615)
- Tough Talk from the Supreme Court on Free Speech : The Illusory Per Se Rule in Garcetti as Further Evidence of Connick’s Unworkable Employee/Citizen Speech Partition (8 J.L. Soc’y 45)
